In two recent opinions issued by the District of Columbia Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals the Court addressed the National Transportation Safety Board’s (“NTSB”) seemingly biased attempts to approve two FAA revocation orders against airmen facing intentional falsification claims. The decisions address the defense of lack of intent that each airman asserted in opposition to the FAA’s claim. For a discussion of the cases and their implications for the “lack of intent” defense, please read my article on the topic here.
- Dallas (Principal Office)
- (214) 780-1400
Proving Intent In An Intentional Falsification Case
at
Greg Reigel
Greg has more than two decades of experience working with airlines, charter companies, fixed base operators, airports, repair stations, pilots, mechanics, and other aviation businesses in aircraft purchase and sale transactions, regulatory compliance including hazmat and drug and alcohol testing, contract negotiation, airport grant assurances, airport leasing, aircraft related agreements, wet leasing, dry leasing, FAA certificate and civil penalty actions and general aviation and business law matters.
Read Full Bio
