• Dallas (Principal Office)
  • (214) 780-1400
  • Home
  • About us
  • Contact
Purple Shackelford Logo-loresPurple Shackelford Logo-loresPurple Shackelford Logo-loresPurple Shackelford Logo-lores
  • Attorneys
  • Industries
  • Expertise
  • News
  • Home
  • About us
  • Contact

Stupid Pilot Tricks

  • Home
  • News - Aviation
  • Stupid Pilot Tricks
Published by Greg Reigel at March 25, 2004

A recent FAA enforcement action provides another example of what I like to refer to as a “stupid pilot trick”. The case arose from a pilot’s execution of three low passes at an airstrip with a snow covered runway being used by snowmobilers. According to the snowmobilers, the aircraft flew within several feet of them and was close enough for the snowmobilers to view the pilot’s face which they said appeared to be “smirking” at them. The snowmobilers believed that the pilot was trying to scare them.

Well, as you might imagine, the snowmobilers did not appreciate the pilot’s low passes and promptly informed the FAA of the incident. An enforcement action followed. The FAA charged the pilot with a violation of FAR 91.119(c) which provides that, except when necessary for takeoff or landing, no person may operate an aircraft over other than congested areas at an altitude less than 500 feet from the surface. In sparsely populated areas, operations must be more than 500 feet from any person, vessel, vehicle, or structure. The FAA also charged him with violation of FAR 91.13(a) which prohibits careless or reckless conduct that potentially endangers the life or property of another. The pilot was specifically charged with recklessness.

At the NTSB hearing, the law judge held that the pilot made three low passes over the airstrip, that the first pass was typical, and that the second pass more than enough to confirm that the runway was safe for landing. However, by making a third pass over a runway that had too much snow for an aircraft equipped with wheels, such as the pilot’s aircraft, and then not landing even though the runway was clear of all obstacles during that last pass, the law judge determined that the pilot’s low passes below 500 feet were not intended for landing.

The law judge upheld the FAA’s 180 day suspension of the pilot’s certificate. The moral of the story: No matter how much you may be tempted to do a “watch this” maneuver (usually something less than safe to impress someone else and often a violation of the FAR’s), don’t do it. In hindsight, I doubt that the pilot in this case feels his low passes were worth the 180 day suspension he received. When the “watch this” urge strikes, resist the temptation. Fly safe and fly smart.

Share
Greg Reigel
Greg Reigel
Greg has more than two decades of experience working with airlines, charter companies, fixed base operators, airports, repair stations, pilots, mechanics, and other aviation businesses in aircraft purchase and sale transactions, regulatory compliance including hazmat and drug and alcohol testing, contract negotiation, airport grant assurances, airport leasing, aircraft related agreements, wet leasing, dry leasing, FAA certificate and civil penalty actions and general aviation and business law matters. Read Full Bio

Related posts

February 21, 2025

DOT Revises First-Half 2025 SIFL Rates


Read more
WisBar
February 19, 2025

Greg Reigel Talks Airline Passenger Rights Regulations With State Bar of Wisconsin


Read more
February 4, 2025

FAA Aircraft Registration Updates


Read more

Shackelford, McKinley & Norton, LLP

Principal Office

Dallas
9201 N. Central Expressway
Fourth Floor
Dallas, Texas 75231

(214) 780-1400

Contact Us

Austin
(512) 469-0900


Fort Worth
(682) 339-9872

Houston
(832) 415-1801


New Orleans
(346) 651-3605

Shortcut Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Attorneys
  • Industries
  • Expertise
  • News
  • Contact
© Shackelford, McKinley & Norton, LLP. All Rights Reserved. Handcrafted by
  • Home
  • About us
  • Contact