• Dallas (Principal Office)
  • (214) 780-1400
  • Home
  • About us
  • Contact
Purple Shackelford Logo-loresPurple Shackelford Logo-loresPurple Shackelford Logo-loresPurple Shackelford Logo-lores
  • Attorneys
  • Industries
  • Expertise
  • News
  • Home
  • About us
  • Contact

Lender Repossession Insurance, Or Take The Risk?

  • Home
  • News - Aviation Aviation Law Articles
  • Lender Repossession Insurance, Or Take The Risk?
Published by Greg Reigel at January 17, 2006

I was recently asked about the risks associated with airline financing secured by aircraft located in foreign countries. The questions boiled down to the issue of whether the lender is willing to accept the risk of potentially being unable to repossess the aircraft securing the financing or whether the lender would rather purchase an insurance policy to insure against that risk.

My answer to the question was that regardless of which situation is presented, either the lender or the insurer will need to perform an underwriting analysis to determine how significant the risk may be. Since the risk varies from country to country, a written legal opinion from an independent lawyer expert in the particular country should be obtained. The legal opinion should discuss the regulations in force at inception of the policy relating to the titleholders rights under the laws of the particular country and it should also confirm that the lender’s interests and title have been fully registered.

Additional underwriting analysis will include review of the loan documents and lease, the political and economic stability of the country, the laws in force, the perception of the local judicial system, the type of aircraft, routes operated, the financial condition of the airline, and past experience of the lender, airline and country.

Another thing to consider will be whether the country has ratified the Cape Town Convention. Although many countries have not ratified it yet, if a country does ratify the Convention, this will remove a great deal of uncertainty and will increase a lender’s willingness to provide financing.

If a lender determines that it does not want to assume the risk and potential financial loss it will incur if it is unable to repossess its aircraft collateral, repossession policies are available through Lloyds of London and other larger insurers. The coverage is typically referred to as the “LSW147” repossession coverage.

At the end of the day, the decision will still be whether the lender wants to “self-insure” and assume the risk that it may not be able to successfully repossess an aircraft in the event of default, or whether it would rather pay an insurance premium to purchase a policy that will provide coverage in the event that it is unable to successfully repossess its collateral.

Share
Greg Reigel
Greg Reigel
Greg has more than two decades of experience working with airlines, charter companies, fixed base operators, airports, repair stations, pilots, mechanics, and other aviation businesses in aircraft purchase and sale transactions, regulatory compliance including hazmat and drug and alcohol testing, contract negotiation, airport grant assurances, airport leasing, aircraft related agreements, wet leasing, dry leasing, FAA certificate and civil penalty actions and general aviation and business law matters. Read Full Bio

Related posts

February 21, 2025

DOT Revises First-Half 2025 SIFL Rates


Read more
WisBar
February 19, 2025

Greg Reigel Talks Airline Passenger Rights Regulations With State Bar of Wisconsin


Read more
February 4, 2025

FAA Aircraft Registration Updates


Read more

Shackelford, McKinley & Norton, LLP

Principal Office

Dallas
9201 N. Central Expressway
Fourth Floor
Dallas, Texas 75231

(214) 780-1400

Contact Us

Austin
(512) 469-0900


Fort Worth
(682) 339-9872

Houston
(832) 415-1801


New Orleans
(346) 651-3605

Shortcut Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Attorneys
  • Industries
  • Expertise
  • News
  • Contact
© Shackelford, McKinley & Norton, LLP. All Rights Reserved. Handcrafted by
  • Home
  • About us
  • Contact