• Dallas (Principal Office)
  • (214) 780-1400
  • Home
  • About us
  • Contact
Purple Shackelford Logo-loresPurple Shackelford Logo-loresPurple Shackelford Logo-loresPurple Shackelford Logo-lores
  • Attorneys
  • Industries
  • Expertise
  • News
  • Home
  • About us
  • Contact

Requests For Re-Examination

  • Home
  • News - Aviation
  • Requests For Re-Examination
Published by Greg Reigel at March 8, 2006

An airman was recently involved in an accident. Although the subsequent company disciplinary action found that the airman had not done anything wrong, the airman later received a request for re-examination from the FAA. I was asked whether the FAA could take this action even though the airman was not disciplined. The answer is, yes, the FAA can.

Under 49 USC 44709, the FAA can request re-examination “at any time”. The FAA is not bound by an employer’s determination regarding discipline arising out of and accident or incident. The standard that the FAA must meet to justify a request for re-examination is whether the request is objectively reasonable. Re-examination requests have been held proper where the request arose out of an incident or accident that “could have been caused” by a deficiency in airman skill or knowledge and requests have been improper where the technical competence of an airman could not have been the cause of the FAA’s regulatory concern.

If lack of competence could have been a factor in the incident or accident that drew the FAA’s attention, the re-examination request will be considered reasonable, without regard to the likelihood that a lack of competence had actually played a role in the event. The FAA only needs to show that such a basis for questioning competence has been implicated, not that a lack of competence has actually been demonstrated.

If an airman receives a request for re-examination, he or she may only refuse the request in very limited circumstances in which the airman is physically unable to undergo the re-examination. Otherwise, failure to submit to re-examination will expose the airman to suspension of his or her airman certificates pending completion of the re-examination.

Share
Greg Reigel
Greg Reigel
Greg has more than two decades of experience working with airlines, charter companies, fixed base operators, airports, repair stations, pilots, mechanics, and other aviation businesses in aircraft purchase and sale transactions, regulatory compliance including hazmat and drug and alcohol testing, contract negotiation, airport grant assurances, airport leasing, aircraft related agreements, wet leasing, dry leasing, FAA certificate and civil penalty actions and general aviation and business law matters. Read Full Bio

Related posts

February 21, 2025

DOT Revises First-Half 2025 SIFL Rates


Read more
WisBar
February 19, 2025

Greg Reigel Talks Airline Passenger Rights Regulations With State Bar of Wisconsin


Read more
February 4, 2025

FAA Aircraft Registration Updates


Read more

Shackelford, McKinley & Norton, LLP

Principal Office

Dallas
9201 N. Central Expressway
Fourth Floor
Dallas, Texas 75231

(214) 780-1400

Contact Us

Austin
(512) 469-0900


Fort Worth
(682) 339-9872

Houston
(832) 415-1801


New Orleans
(346) 651-3605

Shortcut Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Attorneys
  • Industries
  • Expertise
  • News
  • Contact
© Shackelford, McKinley & Norton, LLP. All Rights Reserved. Handcrafted by
  • Home
  • About us
  • Contact